Keywords: «lay» psychoanalysis, «restricted» practice, healing as psychotherapeutic objective{"id":3769,"date":"2021-12-02T18:07:07","date_gmt":"2021-12-02T17:07:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scuoladipsicanalisifreudiana.it\/uncategorized\/una-nota-sopra-una-malintesa-sentenza-della-cassazione-appendice-alla-mia-risposta-alla-memoria-sulla-psicanalisi-laica-dei-proff-dazzi-e-lingiardi\/"},"modified":"2022-01-03T10:54:15","modified_gmt":"2022-01-03T09:54:15","slug":"a-note-on-a-misinterpreted-verdict-of-the-court-of-cassation-appendix-to-my-answer-to-memory-on-lay-psychoanalysis-by-prof-dazzi-and-prof-lingiardi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scuoladipsicanalisifreudiana.it\/en\/a-note-on-a-misinterpreted-verdict-of-the-court-of-cassation-appendix-to-my-answer-to-memory-on-lay-psychoanalysis-by-prof-dazzi-and-prof-lingiardi\/","title":{"rendered":"A note on a misinterpreted verdict of the Court of Cassation. (Appendix to my \u00abAnswer to Memory on \u201clay psychoanalysis\u201d by Prof. Dazzi and Prof. Lingiardi\u00bb)"},"content":{"rendered":"[vc_section full_width=”stretch_row” css=”.vc_custom_1563899907460{background-color: #000000 !important;}”][vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”273″ img_size=”large” css=”.vc_custom_1563985509832{padding-top: 20px !important;}”][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][\/vc_section][vc_section el_id=”abstractContent”][vc_row][vc_column][vc_empty_space height=”20px”][vc_custom_heading text=”A note on a misinterpreted verdict of the Court of Cassation. (Appendix to my \u00abAnswer to Memory on \u201clay psychoanalysis\u201d by Prof. Dazzi and Prof. Lingiardi\u00bb)” font_container=”tag:h1|text_align:left|color:%23e94e1b” google_fonts=”font_family:Roboto%3A100%2C100italic%2C300%2C300italic%2Cregular%2Citalic%2C500%2C500italic%2C700%2C700italic%2C900%2C900italic|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal”][vc_custom_heading text=”pp. 205-211″ font_container=”tag:p|font_size:25px|text_align:left|color:%23000000″ google_fonts=”font_family:Roboto%3A100%2C100italic%2C300%2C300italic%2Cregular%2Citalic%2C500%2C500italic%2C700%2C700italic%2C900%2C900italic|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal”][vc_empty_space height=”20px”][vc_custom_heading text=”Franco Baldini” font_container=”tag:p|font_size:25px|text_align:left|color:%23000000″ google_fonts=”font_family:Roboto%3A100%2C100italic%2C300%2C300italic%2Cregular%2Citalic%2C500%2C500italic%2C700%2C700italic%2C900%2C900italic|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal”][vc_empty_space height=”20px”][vc_column_text]Following a sentence imposed by the Court of Cassation in 2011 to a lay psychoanalyst, a paradoxical situation arose which thwarts the ambiguity of many false supporters of lay psychoanalysis, who are always ready to mourn its demise. Not only does this verdict not put aside lay psychoanalysis, in that such a verdict is only valid for those types of psychoa- nalysis with a medical purpose (relieving suffering, healing) instead of a cognitive purpose as true Freudian psychoanalysis, but it also emerged that, where the analytic Freud-based conversation has no healing purpose, unlike the medical ones, psychoanalysis cannot be considered as a \u00abrestricted\u00bb practice. Therefore, non adherence to Law 56\/89, as the SPF has consciously done, means it can maintain the analytical experience with its distinctive Freudian features.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text][\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]Find it on ResearchGate<\/a>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]How to cite (Chicago style citation):<\/p>\n

Baldini, Franco, \u201cUna nota sopra una malintesa sentenza della Cassazione. (Appendice alla mia Risposta alla Memoria sulla \u00abpsicanalisi laica\u00bb dei proff. Dazzi e Lingiardi)\u201d, Metapsychologica \u2013 Rivista di psicanalisi freudiana,\u00a0<\/em>no.1 (2021), pp. 205-211[\/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space height=”20px”][vc_empty_space height=”20px”][vc_column_text]< Back to the index<\/a>[\/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space height=”50px”][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][\/vc_section]\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Following a sentence imposed by the Court of Cassation in 2011 to a lay psychoanalyst, a paradoxical situation arose which thwarts the ambiguity of many false supporters of lay psychoanalysis, who are always ready to mourn its demise…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[348,347],"tags":[392,394,393],"class_list":["post-3769","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-documents","category-the-psychotherapeutic-illusion-2021-1","tag-lay-psychoanalysis-en-2","tag-restricted-practice","tag-healing-as-psychotherapeutic-objective"],"yoast_head":"\n