The choice of secular psychoanalysis

With regard to training, the School of Freudian Psychoanalysis has always been and will remain a traditional association for training and research within the international psychoanalytic movement. In this sense, it is a secular psychoanalytic association, essentially neither medical nor psychological, although it has both doctors and psychologists within its ranks, and is not, by choice, one of the psychological or psychotherapy training associations.

The reason for excluding itself from the regulations of Law 56/89 (on the establishment of a Register of Psychologists and the regulation of psychotherapy), was mainly due to the fact that the School considered the psychotherapeutic training required by the State as insufficient, as well as essentially alien and limiting for an adequate psychoanalytic preparation. The School does not claim that there should be no form of rules that comply with regulations that Italian or European legislation prescribe for the liberal professions, but believes that Law 56/89 was not designed, as openly admitted by the legislator*, for psychoanalysis and is therefore inadequate to maintain the expertise, practice and research of analytics in its entirety.

 

General eligibility criteria

The School accepts individuals ofall backgrounds for psychoanalytic training, following an interview or series of interviews aimed at ascertaining the actual cultural and moral level of each applicant, as well as hismental balance.

In the event that all these elements are deemed acceptable, an ad hoc study programme will be defined together with the applicant that will take into account hisspecific cognitive requirements. During these studies, hewill be tutored by one or more members of the School. In turn, hewill be registered as a member and will only be required to pay the annual membership fee, since study support will be provided free-of-charge. The applicant will also be required to participate in and support all activities undertaken by the School: courses, workshops, seminars, meetings, conferences and study days, as well as cooperate in its publications. Hewill submit to at least one set of analyses by a School analyst of hischoosing, so that hemay gain direct experience of the workings of the unconscious mind. In the event that the Admission Commission should deem the basic cultural and moral levels acceptable, but feels that the mental balanceof the applicant would not allow the proper exercise of the role of analyst, hewill be required to undergo an actual, complete analysis.

Subsequently, should the applicant demonstrate sufficient cultureand psychological balanceto perform the role of analyst properly, hewill be encouraged and helped to take this path. Later, for a reasonable period, hewill be required to discuss hisclinical cases in clinical seminars with one or more colleagues regularly, in order to gainthe most effective technical and clinical methods. This service is also provided free-of-charge by the School.

Anyone who has already received psychoanalytic training elsewhere, or believes he has done so, and wishesto be registered as a member of the School shall be assessed by an ad hoc committee to evaluate hiscompliance with the standards of the School. In any event, in order for the committee to express itself, there shall be a period of personal analysis, which may continue even after the acceptance of the applicant.

 

Training Standards

The quality of the School is very high, so the applicant should make no mistake about the level of commitment required. The training of a psychoanalyst requires a broad and diverse culture, as well as personal analytic training, under the guidance and direction historically providedby the international psychoanalytical movement and the founder of psychoanalysis. According to Sigmund Freud, a degree in medicine is not required, nor preferential, in order to practice psychoanalysis. As a new science, sui generis, psychoanalysis requires a specific and new training programme. Among the disciplines indicated by Freud are physiology, the history of religion, comparative mythology, literature, philosophy, etc. In addition, nowadays there are linguistics, biology, methodology and epistemology, psychopathology, anthropology, ethnology and others. Currently, the disciplines that a psychoanalyst should study cannot be found in the programmes of the faculties of medicine and psychology. In order to follow a path that is suitable for the scientific and cultural preparation of an analyst, a cross-faculty programme is required; it would be necessary to attend lectures and take examinations in disciplines found in the faculties of medicine, literature and philosophy, biology, sociology, etc.

All this does not exist in the scenario of Italian universities. This is the area in which the School has striven duringthese years, making up for this deficiency at university level by any means.

The training programme for the profession of psychologist, as that of doctor, as well as psychiatrist, differs from that of psychiatrist.

Furthermore, as a science sui generis, psychoanalysis does not require training in the second instance, such as a specialisation in psychology or medicine, but in the first instance.

 

Self-regulation

Since the birth of psychoanalysis, psychoanalytic institutions and associations established in the diverse international psychoanalytical movement, of various theoretical orientations, following the eventful history of psychoanalysis, were and still are responsible for the training of psychoanalysts. The Schools self-regulation in the training of psychoanalysts was inspired by these traditional criteria.

Risposta alla Memoria sulla "psicanalisi laica" 

A fine dicembre 2016 siamo venuti del tutto casualmente a conoscenza di uno scritto intitolato Memoria sulla “psicanalisi laica” a firma dei proff. Nino Dazzi e Vittorio Lingiardi, presente sul sito web dell’Ordine degli Psicologi, redatto su carta intestata del suo Consiglio Nazionale e datato 29 gennaio 2009.
Tale documento è rimasto riservato fino al 3 dicembre 2015, data in cui è stato reso pubblico.
In esso gli autori indirizzano una serie di maldestre critiche alle tesi su cui la Scuola di Psicanalisi Freudiana (SPF) fonda la propria esistenza, la propria collocazione e il proprio operato.
Qui la nostra risposta: Risposta alla Memoria sulla "psicanalisi laica" di Dazzi e Lingiardi.

Leggi tutto

Cerca nel sito

Calendario incontri

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1
2
3
5
6
8
9
10
12
13
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
26
27
29
30
31

Scuola di psicanalisi freudiana
© Scuola di Psicanalisi Freudiana

Tutti i diritti di Copyright sono riservati - P.IVA 11768050152  -  Privacy policy - Contatti
Le immagini della copertina sono tratte dal volume "Sigmund Freud, Wien IX. Berggasse 19" Thelema Edizioni.

This website uses cookies