The work of Sigmund Freud has always been supported by the oft repeated need to establish psychology as a science of nature.

The Freudian School of Psychoanalysis has tried to identify and explain (in clear and conscious contrast with post-Freudian developments) the naturalist and rationalist fundamentals that represent the fundamental assumptions behind the theory and practice of psychoanalysis.

This has essentially involved in two aspects:

• a methodological aspect, which highlighted the prescriptive elements inherent in the empirical character of psychoanalysis, namely the logical-experimental protocols that give analytic practice its rationality (judiciability and falsifiability);

• an epistemological aspect, regarding the establishment of objectivity inherent in psychoanalytic theory (metapsychology).

The aim is to re-establish (as opposed to the often teratological defects that haveinfluenced the development of psychoanalysis in the second half of twentiethcentury) a situation of necessary conformity (consistency) without which a science cannot be termed such. From our perspective (which, as already stated, is merely the same as Freud’s), psychoanalysis is neither a self-fulfilment technique nor conceptual poetics, but a science like any other, without the consequent abandoning of its own specificities.

An equally harmful approach is the attempt to apply a methodological model used in other contexts, not alien to the world of psychoanalysis, with the illusion, by doing so, of solving issues related to experimental control and respondingto criticisms concerningthe objectivity of theoretical propositions. However, similar to that which is happeningin the other fields, the path, if anything, is one of internal epistemology, able to explain the distinctive aspects of psychoanalysis.

Risposta alla Memoria sulla "psicanalisi laica" 

A fine dicembre 2016 siamo venuti del tutto casualmente a conoscenza di uno scritto intitolato Memoria sulla “psicanalisi laica” a firma dei proff. Nino Dazzi e Vittorio Lingiardi, presente sul sito web dell’Ordine degli Psicologi, redatto su carta intestata del suo Consiglio Nazionale e datato 29 gennaio 2009.
Tale documento è rimasto riservato fino al 3 dicembre 2015, data in cui è stato reso pubblico.
In esso gli autori indirizzano una serie di maldestre critiche alle tesi su cui la Scuola di Psicanalisi Freudiana (SPF) fonda la propria esistenza, la propria collocazione e il proprio operato.
Qui la nostra risposta: Risposta alla Memoria sulla "psicanalisi laica" di Dazzi e Lingiardi.

Leggi tutto

Cerca nel sito

Calendario incontri

Scuola di psicanalisi freudiana
© Scuola di Psicanalisi Freudiana

Tutti i diritti di Copyright sono riservati - P.IVA 11768050152  -  Privacy policy - Contatti
Le immagini della copertina sono tratte dal volume "Sigmund Freud, Wien IX. Berggasse 19" Thelema Edizioni.

This website uses cookies